| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Rodj Blake
   |
Posted - 2003.09.12 12:33:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Rodj Blake on 12/09/2003 14:38:35
Edited by: Rodj Blake on 12/09/2003 12:33:52
I am a one man corp, but last night I set in motion a declaration of war against the corporation owned by one of the principal offenders (BansheeBLN).
Dolce et decorum est pro imperator mori |
Rodj Blake
|
Posted - 2003.09.12 13:01:00 -
[2]
I'm told that its normal for one's bowels to act strangely when confronted with such magnificence
Dolce et decorum est pro imperator mori |
Rodj Blake
|
Posted - 2003.09.13 17:28:00 -
[3]
 Quote:
Quote:
Case #2 Richard Saldana
"Maybe he's off having a dirty weekend withthe Empress"
I accuse Richard Sladana of blasphemy against the Eternal Seed, Essence of His Majesty and Vessel in the Conception of the Heirs! Additionally I accuse Richard Sladana of heresy in his unorthodox opinion that any form of weekend could be dirty given the blessing of His Holiness!
So, the word 'he' means 'the Emperor' now does it?
NOT GUILTY on grounds of insufficient evidence!
If the "he" in question was not the Emperor, then surely Sladana is guilty of insulting the Empress by accusing her of adultery.
Dolce et decorum est pro imperator mori |
Rodj Blake
|
Posted - 2003.09.16 09:36:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Rodj Blake on 16/09/2003 09:41:51
Quote:
What I cannot understand is that the vigil seems to be held on the public channel of the amarrian system. Then complaints are made when people interrupted them. If they wished to have privacy, then why did they not use a private channel?
Presumably, it was held on a public channel because it was a public event.
I didn't have a problem with interuptions per se, but rather with the blasphemous comments being made by certain Minmatar interlopers. If they wanted to insult the Emperor, why didn't they do that on a private channel where they would cause less offence?
Dolce et decorum est pro imperator mori |
Rodj Blake
|
Posted - 2003.09.16 14:21:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Rodj Blake on 16/09/2003 14:22:06
I agree that the trader's alledged crime is probably less important than the others in that he was not actively insulting the Emperor.
However, he was persisting in touting his goods after several Amarrian luminaries had requested a minute's silence.
What he was doing was akin to a double-hull salesman selling his wares at a funeral. Would you consider this to be acceptable?
Might I suggest that the trader concerned, and indeed the others accused of blasphemy come onto this forum to defend their actions.
I'm sure that the inquisition will show some leniency if there were extenuating circumstances.
Dolce et decorum est pro imperator mori |
Rodj Blake
|
Posted - 2003.09.16 14:30:00 -
[6]
For what its worth, here are my opinions on the five cases:
1) Guilty - the defendent should be let off with a warning.
2) Guilty - the defendent should be exiled from the Empire.
3) Guilty - the defendent should be killed.
4) Guilty - the defendent should be exiled from the Empire.
5) Guilty - the defendent should be warned about his behaviour.
This is all based on the information that has been published here, and my own experiences at the vigil.
Should any more evidence come to light, I will reconsider.
Dolce et decorum est pro imperator mori |
Rodj Blake
|
Posted - 2003.09.17 07:26:00 -
[7]
Quote:
In due time you blind fool, In due time.
Freedom Will previal in this war.
You would do well to consider that The Emperor is considered by many to be a liberal. If you wish to see the slaves freed, then you should pray with the rest of us for his recovery.
Dolce et decorum est pro imperator mori |
| |
|